|
THESE
ARE THE ISSUES I CONSIDERED WHILE READING YOUR PAPER:
Introduction
Reader
engaged at opening
General background information leading up to specific topic accurate and appropriate
___ excellent ___
good ___ acceptable
___ needs work
More
specific topic area clearly introduced and linked to general area
___ excellent ___
good ___ acceptable
___ needs work
]Research
in literature review accurate, well-chosen, & explained as
specifically/generally as appropriate
___ excellent ___
good ___ acceptable
___ needs work
]Literature
review organized such that there is solid logic
developed leading up to current study
___ excellent ___
good ___ acceptable
___ needs work
Introduce
present study and how it will add to existing research literature
___ excellent ___
good ___ acceptable
___ needs work
Present
predictions at conceptual level and explain logic behind predictions.
___ excellent ___
good ___ acceptable
___ needs work
Formal
presentation of all hypotheses
___ yes ___
no
References
(page)
All
references from text included in reference list ___ yes
___ no
Perfect
APA style used
___ yes ___somewhat ___
no
Formatting
Proper
margins
___ yes ___
no
Double-spaced
throughout
___ yes ___ no
Page
numbers at top right
___ yes ___ no
Appropriate/descriptive
title ___ yes
___ no
Sources
properly referenced
___ all ___most
___ some ___
none
Editing
& Syntax
Thoughts
clearly articulated ___
excellent ___
good ___ acceptable
___ needs work
Sentences
grammatically correct/sound natural
___ excellent ___
good ___ acceptable
___ needs work
Organization
of ideas sensible ___ excellent
___ good ___ acceptable
___ needs work
Spell-checked
& proof-read (automatic
1/3 grade deduction if no) ___
yes ___ no
General “Overall” Criteria:
How
important and meaningful does the paper seem? Was your topic explored
deeply and were your ideas expressed in their full complexity?
In other words, did you take the assignment and really delve into it
thoughtfully?
____
Insightful, important ideas. I
learned from reading your work. Thank you for your efforts!
____
Good, interesting, and significant.
____
OK, but stays a bit on the surface of things.
Explore more deeply. Question
more!
____
Seems superficial.
Did the writing style help make the ideas credible and powerful? Were the ideas organized in a compelling way? Was the presentation interesting? Was the paper clear? Was it eloquent (note – being eloquent means being articulate, concise and having good “flow” in your writing. Flowery words or emotion is not required.)?
____
Eloquent; articulate, well-constructed; very clear.
____
Good in construction (e.g., grammar, spelling, etc.) but not
eloquent/articulate/concise.
____
Some problems in construction (see above).
____
You need to work on this!
Automatic Deductions
|
¨ Psychology Department Home ¨ College Home Page ¨ Website Problems? Contact wolfe@muhlenberg.edu |